In terms of ethics in research and ensuring that information is accurately conveyed within the publication process, this is an essential aspect of ensuring that all individuals involved feel as if the process has spoken directly to the needs of each and every stakeholder. not necessarily a given group to any larger extent as compared to another. Researchers, scholars, and authors have long understood that the guidelines and procedures with respect to the way in which information is represented allow stakeholders to approach such information from a variety of different standpoints. In such a way, the mechanisms through which understanding can be provided are multiplied. allowing a situation in which an approach to the research or an understanding of available information can be determined from an alternative point of view – perhaps even one that the authors or researcher did not initially intent. Not only does this help with the creation of further bodies of knowledge, it also ensures that ethical standards are met and that stakeholders from varying positions are able to utilize the available information and draw inference upon it.
Likewise, in terms of assisting overall credibility, it is without question that the process of ethical consideration and the impact of the way in which information is viewed, and by whom, greatly maximizes the overall level of credibility that any particular publication or scholarship might otherwise achieved. For instance, with respect to the process of writing a university paper, something that is nothing more than practice for the way in which information is revealed and produced in the professional world, the student must be continually aware of the way in which information is represented and the potential for discriminatory bias or other harmful miscomprehensions being present within the publication.