Living in the state of nature is hugely brutish, nasty and short as compared to the human life under the modern government system. Hobbes describes of the commonwealth as a multitude of people admit giving power to a sovereign authority that is established under absolute power over them all (Thomas, 45).
According to (Thomas, 30), the authority is aimed at the purpose of availing peace and subsequent common defense that benefits them equally. The social contract is normally referred to as the covenant. The social contract entails surrendering of some rights especially the natural rights by moving them to another person. The move, however, emanates from the basic understanding of the fact that everyone stops exercising certain power with the essence of the coming up with a common move. The contract helps in creating a deliberate conducive environment for everyone with unity and trust under such systems. The social contract only leaves certain notable powers to the people with huge understanding that the people are content to have that power above them. In order to emphasize his point, Hobbes invites the people to understand what life would be in the absence of the commonwealth or the absence of the government. While some people think that it would be good, that may not be the case. A person would possibly act as the prosecutor, judge and executioner in any case involving him especially when dispute arose. Hobbes provides the baseline for the best indicator n that a person can judge the justifiability of various political alignments. The comprehension is hugely considerable as “the state of mere nature”. The state shows a perfectly very private judgment under which there is typically huge no agency with any eminently recognized authority assigned the role of to arbitrating disputes (Thomas, 210).
In conclusion, I agree with Hobbes on his regards for the shift from state of nature to the commonwealth.