As the paper stresses bureaucracy also characterizes the army whereby specific roles and status of people have the power to influence others’ actions increase as one approaches the top of the organization. Hence, the organization focuses on tasks of each staff that ought to comply with the regulations devised by higher ranks. In this case, bureaucrat embraces the duty complying to the set regulations. Top-level managers in this case bear significant control over decisions of the entire organization’ strategies for the mostly utilized approach encompass control and command.
From this study it is clear that the army has both structural and contextual dimensions used to describe its internal characteristics as well as everything that focus on shaping its structure. Structural dimensions in this case embrace formalization, specialization, and hierarchy of authority, professionalism, centralization and personnel ratios. Conversely, contextual dimensions constitute organizational expertise, environment, size, goals and strategy, and culture. Specialization in the army organization has a degree of tasks available and subdivisions enable it to create separate jobs. Mainly, these jobs bear diverse professions as well as specialties, which imply everyone in the army has a different role to perform. Formalization consists of a documentation authored in the organization. They embrace regulations, job descriptions, procedures, and policy manuals that are set to guide the employees through their specific jobs.