Devry NR505 week 5 Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)

Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)Guidelineswith Scoring RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice inidentifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviewsrelated to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary ofevidence, typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on aparticular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) foridentifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specificclinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk& Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).Course OutcomesThrough this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursingand related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)(CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs andmethodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)Due Date:Sunday11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5Total Points Possible:175 PointsRequirements:1. Choose an SRR that pertains to your practice setting.Describethe relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a SRR topractice. (CO 3, 6)2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR,specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented andcritiqued. (CO 6)4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized inthe SRR. (CO 3, 6)5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for yourcurrent practice and future research. (CO 3, 6)6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate atrue SRR for this assignment.7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages (not including coverpage and reference page(s).Preparing the paperConsult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether yourarticle is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affectedbecause you will not be able to address all of the above objectives.Important: Submit a copy of the permalink for the article that you arecritiquing by placing it on your reference page underneath yourreferences. This will help TurnItIn from returning a high similaritypercentage on your written work. Remember to keep TurnItIn similarityto 24% or less.ReferencesMelnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practicein nursing &healthcare (2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: WoltersKluwer/Lippincott, Williams,& Wilkins.Turnitin®This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.You learned aboutTurnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how toaccess it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcementabout Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.CategoryPoints%DescriptionDescribes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRRto practice.2514.28Fully describes the relevance of the research problemCritiques the research rigor of the SRR article.2514.28Fully critiques the rigor of the SRR articleCritiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies usedwithin the SRR2514.28Fully critiques the level of evidence identified by the type ofstudies used within the SRRCritiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.2514.28Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiquedDescribes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR.2514.28Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRRCritiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for yourcurrent practice and future research2514.28Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for currentpractice and future researchGrammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect format written work.105.71Grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent withrules for formal written work.APA formatting105.71APA formatting is correctSubmit the permalink of the systematic research article you are critiquing.52.85Submits the permalink of the systematic research article that you are critiquing175100%A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment CriteriaExceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceExceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performanceMeets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceNeeds Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performanceDeveloping(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 125 PointsDescribes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRRto practice.25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsFully describes the relevance of the research problem.Describes the relevance of the research problem but does elaboratefully on the relevance of the research problemThe research problem and its relevance are presented but not elaborated.Describes the relevance of the research problem very briefly.Does not describe the relevance of the research problemCritiques the research rigor of the SRR article.25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsFully critiques the rigor of the SRR article.Critiques the rigor of the SRRarticle but occasional information is missing.Critiques the rigor ofthe SRRarticle with a brief critiqueStates the rigor of the SRR article but does not provide critiqueDoes not critique the rigor of the SRR articleCritiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies usedwithin the SRR25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsFully critiques the level of evidence identified by the type ofstudies used within the SRR.Critiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies usedwithin the SRR but occasional information is missing.Critiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies usedwithin the SRR but critique is brief.Critiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies usedwithin the SRR but critique is very brief.No critique providedCritiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsFully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.Describes the clarity with which the studies are presented andcritiqued with occasional missing information.Describes the clarity with which the studies are presented andcritiqued with brief elaboration.Barely describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.Does not describe the clarity with which the studies are presented andcritiqued.Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR.25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsFully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR.Describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRRwith occasional missing information.Describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRRwith missing information and brief elaboration.Partially describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR.Does not describe the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR.Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for yourcurrent practice and future research.25Points22Points20Points10 Points0 PointsCritiques all of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications forcurrent practice andfuture research.Critiques most of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications forcurrent practice andfuture research.Critiques some of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications forcurrent practice and future research.Barely critiques the conclusions of the SRR or only examinedimplications for current practice or future research.Does not critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications forcurrent practice or future research Content Subtotal______/150 pointsFormat Possible Points = 25 PointsUses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling.10 Points9 Points8 Points4 Points0 PointsNo errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling5 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling6 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spellingAPA 6th edition10 Points9 Points8 Points4 Points0 PointsNo APA 6th edition errors1-2 APA 6th edition errors3-4 APA 6th editio
n errors5 APA 6th edition errors6 or more APA 6th edition errorsOR Turnitin similarity percentage onstudent written work is higher than 24%.Submit the permalink of the systematic research article you are critiquing.5 Points0 PointsSubmits the permalink of the systematic research review articleDoes not submit the permalink of the systematic research review articleFormat Subtotal_____/25 pointsTotal Points_____/175 points