Healthy People 2020 is a framework to assist communities in preventing

Healthy People 2020 is a framework to assist communities in preventing disease and promotinghealth. Search the scientific literature and find a research study related to one of the focus areasidentified by Healthy People 2020.In a 750-1000-word essay, critically appraise the study by answering each of the followingquestions:1. What is the study question and is it relevant?2. Does the study add anything new?3. What type of research question is being asked?4. Was the study design appropriate for the research question?5. Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?6. Was the study performed according to the original protocol?7. Does the study test a stated hypothesis? If so, what is it?8. Does the data justify the conclusions?9. Are there any conflicts of interest?10. There are methodological points to consider in appraising literature that are specific tocross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical trials, and case studies. Based on thedesign of this study, what are the key methodical points to consider?You are required to use a minimum of three scholarly resources.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, locatedin the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade theassignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment tobecome familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of theassignment.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the StudentSuccess Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.AssignmentWeek 6 | Association and Errors in EpidemiologyCurrent AllSave LinkAssignment Critical AppraisalView RubricDue Date: Dec 03, 2014 23:59:59Max Points: 100Details:Healthy People 2020 is a framework to assist communities in preventing disease and promotinghealth. Search the scientific literature and find a research study related to one of the focus areasidentified by Healthy People 2020.In a 750-1000-word essay, critically appraise the study by answering each of the followingquestions:1. What is the study question and is it relevant?2. Does the study add anything new?3. What type of research question is being asked?4. Was the study design appropriate for the research question?5. Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?6. Was the study performed according to the original protocol?7. Does the study test a stated hypothesis? If so, what is it?8. Does the data justify the conclusions?9. Are there any conflicts of interest?10. There are methodological points to consider in appraising literature that are specific tocross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical trials, and case studies. Based on thedesign of this study, what are the key methodical points to consider?You are required to use a minimum of three scholarly resources.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, locatedin the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade theassignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment tobecome familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of theassignment.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the StudentSuccess Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" buttonunder "Final Submission" is clicked.New AttemptTitleTurnitinReportAttached DocumentsSimilarityIndexFinalSubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documentsApply RubricsCritical Appraisal12Unsatisfacto Less ThanrySatisfactory0.00%74.00%70.0 %Content10.0 % Topic/IntroductionTheTheinformation has informationminimally been provided isaddressed.mostlycomplete butlacks specificinformationnecessary toassist theaudience inunderstandingthe topic’simportance.30.0 % Critical Analysis of the Ignores orAppraisalstudy is notsuperficiallyoutlined, isevaluates theoutlined poorly, study andor is missing drawsmore than one unwarranted orof thefallaciouscomponents conclusions.(a-j).Evaluation ofcriteria (a-j) ismissing one ormore of thecomponents.30.0 %Content isContentincomplete orComprehensio omits most ofntherequirementsstated in theassignmentcriteria.Content isincomplete oromits somerequirementsstated in theassignmentcriteria.20.0%OrganizationandEffectiveness7.0 % Thesis Paper lacksThesis and/orDevelopment any discernible main claim areand Purpose overall purpose insufficientlyor organizing developedclaim.and/or vague;purpose is notclear.8.0 %ArgumentLogic andConstructionStatement of Sufficientpurpose is not justification ofjustified by the claims isconclusion.lacking.The conclusion Argumentdoes notlackssupport theconsistentclaim made.unity. ThereArgument isare obviousincoherent and flaws in theuseslogic. Somenoncrediblesources havesources.questionablecredibility.5.0 %Mechanics ofWriting(includesspelling,punctuation,grammar,language use)Surface errors Frequent andare pervasive repetitiveenough thatmechanicalthey impede errors distractcommunication the reader.of meaning.InconsistencieInappropriate s in languageword choicechoiceand/or(register),sentencesentenceconstructionstructure,are used.and/or wordchoice arepresent.10.0 %Format5.0 % PaperTemplate is not AppropriateFormat (Use of usedtemplate isappropriateappropriately, used, butstyle for theorsomemajor anddocumentation elements areassignment) format is rarely missing orfollowedmistaken. Acorrectly.lack of controlwith formattingis apparent.5.0 %No referenceResearchpage isCitations (In- included. Notext citations citations areforused.paraphrasingand directquotes, andreference pagelisting andformatting, asappropriate toassignmentand style)100 % TotalWeightageReferencepage ispresent.Citations areinconsistentlyused.