discussion
Module 1 discussion
View the video “Health care and high reliability: a
cautionary tale at
http://www.jointcommission.org/multimedia/dr-chassin-keynote-hro-conference/
or read the transcript of video:
http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/transcripts/Chassin_Part_1_HC_and_HR_a_cautionary_tale.pdf
Discuss the following Questions:
Consider the culture of an organization you have experience
with, would this case incidence easily have happened there? If not,explain why
one factor related to the culture of high-reliability/high quality from the
list provided in your textbook (review Chapter 3, Tables 3.1 and 3.2) exists to
prevent it? OR If so, explain why one
factor related to the culture of high-reliability/high quality from the list
provided in your textbook (review Chapter 3 Tables 3.1 and 3.2 ) is needed to
prevent it?
Review the QSEN competencies/Prelicensure KSAs at
http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/. Considering this case
incidence, answer the following questions
Safety: What could have any of the RNs do to help maintain
the patient safety?
Teamwork-Collaboration: How can the RN work together with
other health care professionals to provide quality patient care and enhance the
patient’s health outcomes?
Informatics: How can technology be used to enhance patient
care?
Quality Improvement: How can one patient-care process be
enhanced to improve the overall quality of patient care?
Remember the rule: Do not identify the organization and its
location and people involved!
Your initial post should consist of complete sentences and
should be at least 2 paragraphs but no more than 3 paragraphs.
Provide in-text citation(s) and references.
You are expected to give constructive feedback/responses to
two peers.
Note: Initial postings are your comments based on the
discussion questions posted by the instructor. Responses to peers are your
replies to your peers’ initial postings.
Submit your initial post by end of day Wednesday and
responses to peers no later than end of the day on Sunday of Module 1. Note
that the longer you wait to respond to peers, the less points given for
timeliness. Please see discussion rubric for evaluation criteria.
