Project

Winter 2017
Marking Rubric
Project

Purpose
The fundamental purpose of the reflective journals is
threefold:
• In the
context of the “e alert” subject matter that you have chosen to follow for the
duration of the course, evidence an increasing understanding of the chosen
subject matter and the various implications of the subject matter on
international business, from a Canadian perspective.
• Evidence
the ability to communicate in a written format in a persuasive and articulate
manner.
• Write
about a given topic in an increasingly informed manner over the term of the
course so that you can clearly state that you are informed about a specific
subject matter (you become the class source of information on the subject
matter you chose).
Topics
Typical topics are provided below.
• World
Bank
• IMF
• Climate
change
• Patent
rules
• Investor
Dispute Resolution
• Country
of origin rules
• Brexit
• China
Free Trade agreement
• NAFTA
• CETA
• TPP
• Automation
• Social
license
• Special
topic to be presented to the Professor for approval

Report Structure
The normal flow/structure of the journal would be:
a) Title
page with identification of the subject and student name
b) Briefly
outline the content of the article(s)
c) Discuss
the article, placing it in the context of Canadian interests in the
international business context (i.e. draw linkages to course content)
d) Provide
your opinion with rationale as to WHY
you support or do not support the article’s stated position
e) Proper
APA citation of the article.
Any RJ that is submitted using source material dated 6
months or greater in the past, from the date of your RJ, will be returned to
the student for updating with more current source information.

Administrative Issues
• Individual
work submitted on Slate (drop box)
pursuant to posted schedule
• There are
5 opportunities to submit, only the 4 with the highest marks will be considered
for final grading
• Typed:
Times New Roman, font 12, double spaced
• Maximum
pages are 2, plus the title page and page for references.

Grading Rubric
The grading rubric for the RJ’s is presented below.
Criteria Poor to
Fair (less than 6) Satisfactory to Good (6 to 7.5) Good
to Very Good ( 7.5 to 9) Excellent (>9)
Subject matter discussion Limited
discussion of the subject matter, evidencing a lack of understanding of the
subject. Did not go beyond the basic content of the article chosen. No connection to course material

Only one source Discussion
is more advanced, in terms of detail, but discussion still lacks clarity

Limited connection to course

Only one source Discussion
is advanced in terms of detail and nuance.

Significant connection to course material

Two sources Discussion
evidences superior knowledge, insight and nuance.

Insightful connection to course material

Multiple sources
Opinion offered Little
or no opinion shown. Individual simply restated the information from the source
article Individual
attempted some level of interpretation to arrive at an opinion, but defense of
opinion offered was weak. Individual
articulated well their opinion of the subject matter and defended that argument
with at least one strong argument. Individual
articulated well their opinion of the subject matter and defended that argument
with at least two strong arguments.
Readability Poor
use of language. Multiple and consistent grammar and/or spelling errors. No
focused structure to the journal. Limited
and inconsistent use of language. Moderate but consistent grammar and/or
spelling errors. Some structure needs improvement to connect ideas presented. Good
use of language with few grammar and/or spelling errors. Good structure with
clear flow of ideas. Strong
use of language with no grammar and/or spelling errors. Strong structure with
clear flow of multiple ideas throughout journal.

Examples of Credible Sources
• Globe and
Mail
• National
Post
• Financial
Post
• Guardian
• Wall
Street Journal (Asian or European edition)
• Economist
• Peterson
Institute for International Economics
• Conference
Board of Canada
• Frazer
Institute
• Broadbent
National Bureau of Economic Research
• World
Bank
• IMF
• Council
of Canadians

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Essay Fountain
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Sociology
The writer covered all points as expected by the professor. Thank you for your commitment to serve students.
Customer 452919, February 21st, 2024
Sociology
Thank you, the journal wa submitted today and I hope to continue receiving services.
Customer 452919, October 28th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
The support team was available upon request. For the past two semesters I have been stressing on receiving my assignments on expected achievement dates. I value your service and hope that you all would improve your teamwork. I have been using this service now for 2-years and was totally satisfied. With this being said, I have spent at least a thousand plus dollars with this company. Knowing there are other competing companies that are on the market for a lot less than you guys are charging. "I trust that you all would get it together and avoid last minute communication which increases stress to the student."
Customer 452919, March 27th, 2024
Biology (and other Life Sciences)
Thank you
Customer 452995, November 22nd, 2021
Nursing
The second attempt was an unplagiarized paper. Thank you
Customer 452545, September 25th, 2020
Marketing
Excellent and thank you!
Customer 452591, December 12th, 2020
History
Thank you
Customer 452919, October 28th, 2024
Sociology
Thank you for following the guidelines of the discussion essay. We are off to a great start.
Customer 452919, March 20th, 2024
Sociology
Thank you Team!
Customer 452919, April 5th, 2022
Psychology
Paper was received before time which I was quite please with.
Customer 453101, June 18th, 2022
Sociology
Thank you for your service. I hope that everyone had a happy Thanksgiving.
Customer 452919, November 23rd, 2021
Nutrition, Hospitality & Human Services
Thank you for your assistance.
Customer 452919, April 13th, 2024
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat