TEL 212 – The supporting information is general and lacks specific supports of course content and material

!Exceeds!Meets!!Needs!Focus on ContentPoints:4-5There is a clear focus ontopic. All main ideas areaddressed and supportedby course contentinformation.Points:2-3The main topic is clear butthe supporting informationis general and lacksspecific supports of coursecontent and material.Points:0-1The main topic is clear butthe supporting informationis general and lacksspecific supports of coursecontent and material.ReflectionPoints:4-5Reflection conveysevidence of a personalperspective and roleresponse to the issuesraised in the coursematerials. The chosen roleis clear and the studentdemonstrates professionalawareness and insight.Points:0-1Reflection conveys little ifany personal perspectiveto role response to theissues raised in the coursematerials. The chosen roleis unclear and the studentdoes not demonstrate orpoorly demonstratesawareness and insightsrelated to the role andissues.ApplicationPoints:4-5Content displays studentproficiency in articulatingideas about coursematerials and content andapplication is evident to theselected role.Points:4-5The student is makingconnections to coursematerials and uses criticalthinking elements inrelating their reflectiveresponses to the issuesraisedPoints:4-5APA format is followed andincludes:- Properly formatted titlepage, in-text citations,headings/subheadings andreference page;- Introduction andconclusion of topic inown paragraphs- Professional writing (nocontractions, thirdperson, formal tone,balance of research andown writing)- Entry has minimal errorsPoints:2-3Reflection conveys apersonal perspective androle response to the issuesraised in the coursematerials. The chosen roleis less than clear in theresponse and lacksspecific details related tothat role. The student isbeginning to demonstratesome insights andawareness but omits keyelements pertinent to therole/issues.Points:2-3Content displays anunderstanding of coursematerials but demonstrateslittle relevance of coursematerials to the selectedrole.Points:2-3The student comprehendssurface level meaning ofcourse materials but doesnot demonstrate criticalthinking elements in theirreflective responses to theissues raised.Points:2-3APA format is somewhatfollowed and there aresome errors in format inthe following areas:- Format of title page, intext citations, headings/subheadings andreference page;- Introduction andconclusion of topic inown paragraphs- Professional writing (nocontractions, thirdperson, formal tone,balance of research andown writing)Knowledge BaseWriting/ Quality ofpresentationPoints:0-1Content does not indicatethe student’s ability toadequately articulate andapply course materials tothe selected role.Points:0-1The student does notdemonstrate basiccomprehension of coursematerials and struggles torelate information in theirreflective responses to theissues raised.Points:0-1APA format notconsistently followed andis there are multiple errorsin format in the followingareas:- Format of title page, intext citations, headings/subheadings andreference page;- Introduction andconclusion of topic inown paragraphs- Professional writing (nocontractions, thirdperson, formal tone,balance of research and(2 or less) in grammar,spelling, andpunctuation.- Presentationincorporates highlyilluminating pictures andother graphics on mostslides to enhance thetext of the presentation;cohesive and highquality in design- Entry is mostly free ofgrammatical, spelling,and punctuation errors.(3-5 errors)- Presentationincorporates somepictures and othergraphics that enhancethe text of thepresentation; cohesiveand high quality indesignown writing)- Entry lacks attention togrammar, spelling andpunctuation. There aremore than 6 errors.- Presentation includesonly a few pictures andother graphics toenhance the text of thepresentation;inconsistent design andformat