The guidelines for project initiation, feasibility analysis

Question:Write a brief review (between 200-500 words) that explains what you consider to be themost clear breach of the guidelines for project initiation, feasibility analysis or projectselection in the examples given by Charette (please be sure to identify the ‘breach’ as aheader to your post).Make sure your review relates directly to the points raised in the article and the textbook.Are there similarities or differences; agreements or disagreements; consistencies orinconsistencies?To get Full points:The source(s) selected is (are) authoritative, relevant to the discussion topic, provide(s)reliable data or other evidence and is up-to-date.The summary provides a rigorous and insightful analysis of the key issues and concernsin the source article(s). Evidence is used to present a coherent and well balancedargument.The summary builds on the points raised in the lead article(s) to provide a meaningfulcritique of the issues, concerns and phenomena being discussed. The writing is cogentand focused, providing an original and clearly articulated contribution to the discussionthread.The writing is coherent enabling the reader to follow the points being made with ease.The style is engaging and holds the reader’s attention. The summary is substantial (morethan 200 words) but not overwhelming (greater than 500 words).