Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, both the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s

Business Law True False Help Please?1.Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, both the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s negligence are taken into consideration.2.An Internet service provider (ISP) is not normally liable for its users’ defamatory remarks.3.An Internet service provider cannot be held liable in tort for disseminating his or her own defamatory remarks4.In a comparative negligence state, if a plaintiff is found to be 30 percent negligent, the award against the defendant will be reduced by 70 percent.5.A person does not assume a risk that is different from or greater than the risk normally carried by an activity.6.An assumption of risk defense requires that there be knowledge of the risk and voluntary assumption of the risk.7.An unforeseeable intervening event can break the connection between a wrongful act and an injury to another.8.In considering the issue of causation in a tort action, the courts ask only whether an act was the proximate cause of the injury.9.For purposes of establishing negligence, causation in fact exists if an injury would have occurred even without the defendant’s act.10.To avoid liability for negligence, a business owner must protect its patrons against foreseeable risks.